Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Pirating Windows XP is about to get real irritating

September 2nd 2008 10:33
Windows XP will remind you that you're pirating
When Microsoft Vista was released, Microsoft, in their ultimate wisdom, decided to one-up the pirates. They made Vista periodically check with the big, bad, nasty MS servers to see if the operating system was valid - if it failed the check, Vista would sternly shut down, only allowing you to access the internet and only to validate the operating system.


Unfortunately, as we've learned from the past, but what software companies are doomed to repeat, is that systems like this work fine in theory, but are always subject to problems. Many users were falsely locked out of Vista, which meant that their new computer was now a very expensive brick.

Microsoft sheepishly removed the validation freeze, but kept the check in place. Instead of locking you out, Vista would just harass you.

And now, since XP is selling much better than Vista, they're going to update the same feature into XP Pro.


I can understand Microsoft wanting to eliminate piracy, but, when you think about it, you're paying for them to add a service to check if you're a thief. It's an insulting system, like those 'Don't steal movies!' ads they play before movies.

As TechBlog says:

"While I don't think users of activated, valid copies of XP Pro will care much about this, it could become an issue if WGA malfunctions, as it has in the past. If Microsoft's WGA servers mistakenly report a valid copy as being not genuine, XP Pro users aren't likely to "value" this feature all that much."


I'm looking forward to the day when all this DRM/WGA garbage goes away. Will it ever, or will I just live blissfully ignorant in FOSS?

67
Vote
Shared on


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
9 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Cheryl J

September 2nd 2008 11:53
It's all getting very irritating. I've avoided Vista but I do use XP and the thought that even more faults could occur is incredibly annoying.

Comment by Anonymous

September 2nd 2008 16:16
I bought a genuine edition of Microsoft Office 2000 several years ago. I worked well until Microsoft decided to check for validation. For some time, I had not problem. Then, all of a sudden, it started saying that I did not have a valid version, or whatever they say.
When I questioned them, they said if it was purchased prior to their new set-ups this could happen. Nothing was provided to help me get my Office 2000 up and running properly.
Now, my Outlook 2003 will not work because they say I have an invalid version of Office 2000.
Go figure!
Now, it will cost over $400 USD, to get another Office edition.

Comment by Cibbuano

September 2nd 2008 22:43
Cheryl, I had enough last year, with all the problems I had with Windows, so I switched to Linux. Anonymous, your story is terrifying... if you paid for it, you expect it to work.

These validation schemes seem harmless, in theory, but as we've seen over and over, companies are not faultless in running the scheme.


Comment by Cheryl J

September 3rd 2008 01:55
So Cib, I'll have to find out more about Linux but are you happy with it? I like the idea of open source, one of the reasons I prefer Firefox over the dreaded explorer.

Anon, you're not the only person I've heard about this happening to. It's appalling.

Comment by Cibbuano

September 3rd 2008 03:10
If you like the concept of open source, you'll love Linux. I'm very satisfied with the community support for Ubuntu and the wide variety of free software.


Comment by TimmyH

September 5th 2008 19:14
Don't stress...Google will have something else for us soon

Comment by Cibbuano

September 6th 2008 22:17
Timmy, I'm not using Windows, so no worries for me!


Comment by Anonymous

September 9th 2008 02:52
I run Unbuntu a Linux OS because of this very issue. We bought an E machine in 2004. Over the years we have had to replace several parts, leading us to reinstall windows several times. When they refused to allow us to reinstall the last time, we were FORCED to use Unbuntu. By the time they allowed us to reinstall, we were so comfortable with Unbuntu and had customized it so much, we never went back. Windows is very draconian and un-trusting of their own customer base. Even though there have been a few snags over the years, Unbuntu is a clear winner as far as freedom is concerned.

My question is, do publishers attack the buyers of their books in the same manner? Do they lease the use of a book, putting digital codes on them so you can't open them unless you have the proper clearance? No. Software is like a book.

Comment by Anonymous

October 15th 2008 07:46
Its Ubuntu not Unbuntu

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
3 Posts
3 Posts
95 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Cibbuano
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]